Trump administration demands hospitals share emergency room records
A group of Democratic lawmakers is calling for the Trump administration to suspend a new surveillance program it quietly launched to collect the personal and identifiable health data of Americans who visit emergency rooms, reports BritPanorama.
KFF Health News first reported that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)—a federal agency tasked with monitoring injuries from household items—was pressuring hospitals to provide a private company with personally identifiable health information for analysis. The rollout of the program has inspired broad pushback from hospitals and privacy advocates.
The CPSC’s goal is to obtain millions of Americans’ medical records from emergency rooms for most injuries, even when a consumer product is not involved, internal emails and documents reviewed by KFF Health News revealed. The agency instructed hospitals to share detailed patient information for more than 10,000 types of injuries or conditions, such as vaccine reactions, suicide attempts, or stingray stabs.
Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey, who sits on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, along with other House and Senate Democrats, wrote to CPSC acting Chairman Peter Feldman, stating that the scope of data the CPSC is collecting far exceeds the agency’s mission and should be immediately suspended.
“This unprecedented and sweeping effort to collect identifiable patient data is untethered from the Commission’s statutory mission and authority, and is ripe for misuse by an administration that has repeatedly sought access to Americans’ most personal information,” the letter stated. “Americans should be able to seek medical care without fear that their personal health information will be swept into a federal database and repurposed for political ends.”
Among other Democrats signing the letter were Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, and Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee.
CPSC spokesperson Steve Roney did not answer several questions about the program and the call for it to be suspended. “We received the letter, and will respond directly, through the appropriate channels,” he said in a statement.
The CPSC is one of several agencies that have launched broad acquisitions of Americans’ sensitive medical records during Trump’s second term. The Office of Personnel Management has requested federal workers’ sensitive health information, while Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has tasked at least one private organization with collecting additional medical records for studies on vaccines and autism.
The CPSC has operated a voluntary program for decades that enables trained hospital workers based in about 70 hospitals nationwide to report injuries involving consumer products, known as the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Historically, this data collection has been far narrower, with patients’ identifiable information requested in fewer than 1% of cases.
Without public notice, CPSC staffers overhauled the program earlier this year—rebranding it as NEISS-R—and informed hospital executives that participation is mandatory, requiring them to report far more identifiable patient details from more injuries to a private company named Konza Health. The Kansas-based company was awarded a five-year contract last year worth up to $15.9 million with the CPSC.
In emails and contract language reviewed by KFF Health News, Konza representatives described hospital participation as “mandatory” or “required.” Emails sent this year by CPSC chief data officer Elizabeth Puchek indicated that hospitals would need to apply for an exemption from participation or face penalties for what is termed unlawful “information blocking.” The agency’s website reiterated that information-blocking regulations require hospitals to make electronic health information (EHI) available to public health authorities, such as the CPSC, upon request, unless a specific exception applies.
The power play has inspired widespread resistance. The American Hospital Association sent a letter in August asking for modifications to the program, citing “confusion and concern about the scope of patient information” demanded by the agency.
In recent weeks, the agency has begun to backtrack, removing mentions of “information blocking” penalties from its public page.
CPSC Chairman Feldman, a Trump appointee, stated in an interview last month with Nextgov/FCW that the new program would “remain a voluntary” one.
Democrats highlighted these discrepancies and changes, emphasizing that the agency has bypassed regulations and failed to publicly articulate a detailed plan for its data collection, as required by law.
“The Commission has since quietly removed the information blocking rationale from its public NEISS webpage, without any public correction or acknowledgment that the claim it spent months promoting was without basis,” the letter said. “This reversal does not undo the coercion hospitals experienced, but rather raises the question of whether the Commission’s purported legal justifications were ever more than post-hoc cover for an agenda that had little to do with its statutory authority.” The letter calls for a response from the CPSC by September 18.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
