Latvian employers are systematically exploiting Ukrainian refugees through unpaid wages, lack of employment contracts, and predatory labour practices, according to a leading migrant support organisation.
Support organisation documents widespread abuse
The Latvian society Patvērums “Drošā māja” (Shelter “Safe Home”) has documented dozens of cases where businesses have taken advantage of Ukrainian civilians fleeing war. The organisation’s lawyer, Gita Miruškina, stated that Ukrainian civilians genuinely attempt to work and seek employment, but Latvian employers frequently behave very dishonestly when hiring them. The findings reveal a pattern of employers withholding promised salaries, refusing to formalise employment relationships, and capitalising on individuals’ vulnerable circumstances.
Official statistics confirm rising migrant complaints
The State Labour Inspectorate of Latvia (VDI) has verified an increasing number of complaints from third-country nationals, particularly Ukrainians. While the overall number of complaints to the inspectorate has not risen, officials note a marked increase in approaches specifically from foreign arrivals. The inspectorate indicated that most complaints arrive after employment has ended, though proving employer misconduct is significantly easier while the working relationship remains active.
Legal assistance reveals scale of problem
During 2025, 38 Ukrainian civilians personally approached Patvērums “Drošā māja” for assistance with labour law issues. Many individuals, upon discovering the complexity of achieving resolution, did not return for further help. The organisation assisted six Ukrainians in preparing court claims against their employers. Ukrainian refugees, who have received international protection due to the war, possess the right to work in Latvia on equal terms with other residents.
Broader implications for trust and stability
The exploitation of vulnerable refugees creates risks for confidence in Latvian state institutions as guarantors of rights and legality. Unaddressed cases could foster perceptions of a country unable to ensure equal working conditions for its most vulnerable groups. Such incidents also present potential material for disinformation campaigns seeking to undermine Baltic states and European unity regarding support for Ukraine.
Authorities face enforcement challenges
Labour inspectors acknowledge the difficulties in pursuing cases where employment has terminated and evidence is scarce. The situation highlights the need for robust enforcement, including potential criminal law applications for clear cases of fraud or exploitation. The public discussion of these incidents demonstrates functioning democratic mechanisms of oversight and transparency within Latvia’s institutional framework.
