On 26 June 2025, Sergey Naryshkin, head of Russia’s foreign intelligence service, claimed that European governments are attempting to “disrupt negotiations” with Ukraine and “distort their content.” These allegations were widely echoed by Russian state media, forming part of a broader Kremlin information campaign aimed at shifting responsibility for the war’s prolongation onto the West and Kyiv (source, source).
Russia seeks to rewrite the narrative
The Kremlin is actively trying to reshape Western perceptions of the conflict by promoting the idea that Western countries are blocking a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv. This narrative runs counter to Russia’s consistent refusal to engage in meaningful talks that would respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The accusations come amid continued Russian missile strikes on Ukrainian cities and repressive measures in occupied regions, highlighting Moscow’s lack of political will for peace (analysis).
History of failed negotiations and ultimatums
Russia itself has repeatedly undermined peace efforts, including the Istanbul negotiations in 2022 and 2025, by withdrawing or sabotaging talks after its demands were not met. No constructive proposals have been offered by Moscow—only insistence on recognising “new territorial realities,” effectively demanding Ukraine’s capitulation (coverage).
West supports Ukraine’s sovereignty as foundation for peace
Contrary to Kremlin claims, Western countries are not obstructing peace but supporting Ukraine’s right to sovereignty, which is fundamental for any just and lasting resolution. Moscow’s references to peace are tactical, used to exert pressure and destabilise, without offering evidence of genuine readiness to negotiate. International initiatives, including the recent peace summit in Switzerland, underscore that it is Ukraine and its allies who are pursuing diplomatic solutions, while Russia resorts to ultimatums (analysis).
Kremlin’s attempt to normalise aggression
This propaganda campaign also aims to normalise Russia’s aggression by forcing global acceptance of its illegal annexations as a “new normal,” directly challenging principles of international law. Meanwhile, the war continues unabated, with Russia maintaining its military and political pressure on Ukraine and occupied territories.
The Kremlin’s narrative shift highlights ongoing risks to international stability and legal norms, underscoring the vital importance of sustained international support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and the pursuit of a fair peace.
