Labour’s new human rights chief faces backlash over migrant comments
Labour’s new human rights chief Mary-Ann Stephenson has drawn criticism for stating that “demonising migrants” jeopardizes lives, urging politicians to refrain from criticizing illegal arrivals. She contended that such rhetoric could severely impact ethnic minority citizens in the UK, reports BritPanorama.
Stephenson, recently appointed as chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, articulated her concerns during an interview, citing the adverse effects of negative discourse on migrants. She warned that this type of language, often employed in political rhetoric, can create an environment where it becomes difficult for both new arrivals and established minority communities to navigate social landscapes.
Her remarks prompted a swift response from Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, who accused Stephenson of framing those worried about border security as “racist.” He criticized her statement as being disrespectful to legitimate concerns regarding unauthorized immigration, asserting that it dismisses the fears of many British citizens regarding the social implications of migration.
Philp stated, “Once again, the left tries to paint those opposed to mass immigration and illegal immigration as racist… This nonsense has to end.” He cited increased rates of sexual crimes committed by foreign nationals as a significant concern that needs addressing, arguing that discussions around immigration should not overlook these issues.
Stephenson also defended the role of European human rights courts, asserting that they “protect all of us” and urging politicians to avoid pursuing measures that would lead to the UK’s exit from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This aligns with her assertion that leaving the ECHR would weaken rights that benefit everyone in society.
In her first interview since taking office, she remarked, “I think leaving the European Convention is a mistake. It weakens the rights that all of us depend on.” She further emphasized the need for honesty in discussions surrounding human rights, particularly in the context of illegal immigration.
As the conversation around immigration reforms continues, Alain Berset, secretary general of the Council of Europe, highlighted that member states are making strides towards exploring changes to the ECHR framework. A new political declaration is set to begin discussions in Moldova in May 2026, indicating movement towards potential reform.
Stephenson’s comments and the subsequent reactions reflect ongoing tensions between immigration policies, public sentiment, and political accountability in the United Kingdom, an area that continues to shape the nation’s socio-political landscape.
As debates about immigration and human rights unfold, the challenge remains for policymakers to balance public concerns with the principles of a society built on inclusivity and respect for all individuals. The evolving dialogue will likely influence both domestic policies and the UK’s standing within international human rights frameworks.
